Various surveys have shown usage of Google Scholar is rising among researchers, particularly beginning and intermediate level researchers. Our own internal statistics such as link resolver statistics and views of Libguides on Google Scholar, tell a similar story.Of course, researchers including librarians have taken note of this and there is intense interest in details about Google Scholar.
I noticed for example in April....
Top 10 “Hot” Articles in Library and Information Science, April 2014 http://t.co/6IO0rwWzur - 5 out of 10 about google scholar.
— Aaron Tay (@aarontay) April 13, 2014
Read his full post @ Musings about librarianship.More recently there was also the release of a Google Scholar Digest that is well worth reading.
Sadly Google Scholar is something I've argued that libraries don't have any competitive advantage in, because we are not paying customers, so Google does not owe us any answers, so learning about it is mostly trial and error.
Recently, I've been fortunate to be able to encounter and study Google Scholar from different angles at work including
a) Work on discovery services - lead me to study the differences and similarities of Google Scholar and Summon (also on systematic reviews). Also helping test and setting up the link resolver for Google Scholar.
b) Work on bibliometrics team - lead me to study the strengths and weakness of Google Scholar and related services such as Google Citations and Google Scholar Metrics vs Web of Science/Scopus as a citation tool.
c) Most recently, I've was studying a little how entries in our Institutional repositories were indexed and displayed in Google Scholar.
I would like to set out 8 points/features on Google Scholar that surprised me when I learnt about them, I hope they are things you find surprising or interesting as well.